Created and written by Vanessa
An example of a legal hypertext system is Austlii (The Australasian Legal Information Institute) which provides free access to legal materials (primary and secondary) on the internet. Austlii utilises hypertext extensively, and the creation of hypertexts are automated.
Sources of legal material may include predecessors who provided such material (like the government) or primary creators of data, eg: Courts. When legal documents are obtained from the original creator, the data needs to be extracted. For example, we need to know definitions of terms and where the different sections of an Act are. The English language is complex and can be ambiguous. Definitions for the same word may vary from section to section. In some circumstances, the context must be understood to fully appreciate the meaning of a sentence.
There are 3 main ways to process and extract data from legal materials and to create a legal hypertext system:
As a free legal materials provider, Austlii adopts the 2nd approach of automatic markup. There are over 30 million automatically inserted hypertext links in Austlii’s 4 million pages, including links to statutory definitions, other sections and cases. In practise, web publishers may use a combination of these approaches. Legal publishers who opt for the 3rd approach may use a combination of automated and human processing for creating hypertexts.